BJGP Open

Objective: To identify patient, clinician, therapist and service priorities for a health-literacy intervention combining patient education with patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) feedback in routine hand surgery and hand therapy. Methods: A qualitative co-design study was undertaken across public and private hand-care contexts in New South Wales, Australia. Twelve stakeholders participated: five consumers, three hand surgeons, one hand therapist and three administrative/managerial staff. Individual interviews plus a clinician group discussion were conducted. Data were collected in March 2026, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and de-identified. General inductive thematic analysis was undertaken in NVivo by one researcher, with final themes reviewed by co-investigators. Results: Four themes guided intervention design: (1) providing information is not enough, it must be understood, retained and reinforced; (2) patients need a practical roadmap of diagnosis, treatment, recovery and rehabilitation; (3) education should be multimodal, reusable and adaptable to individual needs; and (4) PROMs should improve the clinical conversation rather than become another burden. Participants supported brief, accessible PROMs and visual feedback over time, but views differed on comparison with other patients because benchmarking could either reassure or create anxiety and unrealistic expectations. Conclusion: Health-literate hand care requires more than readable leaflets. It requires repeated, practical and adaptable communication across the care pathway, with PROM feedback embedded in patient-clinician conversations. Practice implications: Hand services should pair standardized core education with flexible delivery and use brief PROMs as conversation tools. Longitudinal displays may support monitoring and shared decisions, while group comparisons should be optional and carefully explained.

Background Effective communication during consultations is facilitated by clinical empathy and realistic optimism, and can enhance patient satisfaction with care, alleviate symptoms, and improve quality of life. However, primary care systems are under significant strain and changing rapidly, which may affect practitioners' ability to communicate empathically and convey realistic optimism, with implications for the patient-practitioner relationship and patient outcomes. Understanding patients' perspectives of healthcare communication in the current clinical context is therefore important. We aimed to explore patients' experiences and perceptions of communication in UK primary care consultations, focussing on the communication of clinical empathy and realistic optimism. Methods A qualitative interview study was conducted as part of a multi-centre cluster-randomised trial of EMPathicO, a brief e-learning package for Primary Care Practitioners (PCPs) on communicating clinical empathy and realistic optimism. Participants were not aware whether their general practice had access to EMPathicO or not. Interviews were conducted within 7-14 days of participants' consultations, explored their views and experiences of clinical empathy and realistic optimism, and were transcribed verbatim. Interviews were analysed using Ritchie and Spencer's Framework Method. Results We conducted semi-structured audio-recorded qualitative telephone interviews with 71 participants from 29 primary care practices taking part in the EMPathicO trial. Following comprehensive mapping of data to the framework derived following initial analysis, four themes were agreed. Overall, most participants described positive empathic consultations with their PCPs, however, participants' experiences were shaped by wider systemic and contextual factors. They described a stretched and inefficient primary care system impacting empathy and optimism; the impact of PCP 'preparedness' as a marker for empathy; how consultation modality (i.e. in-person or telephone) shaped perceptions of empathy, and how PCPs sharing next steps in participants' treatment and management could foster realistic optimism. Conclusions While clinical empathy and realistic optimism may be experienced by patients during consultations with practitioners, the wider contextual challenges of accessing and navigating primary care systems can threaten overall perceptions of feeling cared for. Future primary care policy and workforce training must consider these system pressures to preserve effective communication in consultations and positive patient-practitioner encounters.

Background. Guidelines recommend surgery for moderate and severe cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) but support either surgery or nonoperative care for mild disease. How patients weigh the adverse events associated with each pathway is not well characterized. Methods. We conducted a three-arm randomized vignette experiment among United States adults aged 40 years and older recruited through an online research panel. All participants read an identical description of mild CSM and were randomized to one of three scenarios: surgery that improved symptoms, surgery that halted progression without improvement, or nonoperative management with symptom progression. Participants in the surgical scenarios rated 12 possible complications and those in the nonoperative scenario rated 8 progression outcomes. For each item, participants rated how strongly it would influence their decision (0-10) and whether they would still choose the same treatment. Items for which participants would no longer choose the same treatment were termed dominant decision factors. Results. Of 276 respondents, 263 (95.2%) were analyzed. Dominant factor rates ranged from 13.5% to 87.8% across complications. Complications described as persisting at one year produced substantially higher rates than the same complications described as resolving by three months. Adverse events more frequently constituted dominant factors when surgery was framed as offering less benefit, although differences between scenarios were not statistically significant. In the nonoperative scenario, worsening bladder control (56.6%) and neck pain interfering with sleep (53.0%) were the strongest influences, exceeding needing a cane to walk (32.1%). Conclusions. Treatment decisions for mild CSM are driven primarily by the expected permanence of adverse events and their anticipated impact on daily quality of life, rather than by conventional neurological metrics or surgical benefit framing.

Mobile clinical-support applications can facilitate access to evidence-based information at the point of care, but evidence on their usability and perceived usefulness among newly graduated physicians working in health facilities with limited capacity is scarce. We assessed physicians experiences with BMJ Best Practice using a convergent mixed-methods study. All 81 eligible physicians assigned to rural facilities were invited; 32 enrolled and received application access and training. After three months, participants completed an online survey, and 23 reported using the application. Ten physicians reporting the highest consultation frequency were purposively selected for semi-structured interviews. Survey findings showed a predominantly favorable perception of usability: for most items, 70%-90% of participants agreed or strongly agreed with the statements assessed. Among users, 14 of 23 (60.9%) used the mobile application and 9 (39.1%) used the web version. Interviews indicated that participants valued rapid searches, organized and evidence-based information, and support for diagnostic reasoning, referral decisions, learning, and clinical confidence. Barriers included limited connectivity, difficulties searching in Spanish, automatic updates, challenges locating or using some calculators, and treatment information that was sometimes insufficiently specific. Most importantly, participants could not always implement recommendations because suggested medicines, diagnostic tests, or other resources were unavailable in their facilities. Mobile clinical-support applications may complement decision-making and learning among early-career physicians in rural primary care. However, their practical value depends not only on usability and evidence quality, but also on adaptation to users language, workflow, connectivity, and local service capacity.

Background: Public and clinical attention to postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) has increased, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. We quantified changes in United Kingdom Google search interest and examined whether searches increasingly used diagnostic and self-assessment language. Methods: We extracted monthly Google Trends relative search volume (RSV; 0-100) for the Health-category search term 'Pots syndrome' in the United Kingdom from January 2004 through July 2026. Five extraction attempts were made; two returned complete, identical monthly series and were retained. Prespecified eras were summarised and an exploratory interrupted time-series model at March 2020 used ordinary least squares with Newey-West heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent standard errors (12 lags). Comparator searches included conventional orthostatic diagnoses, POTS diagnostic terms, associated conditions and YouTube searches. Results: The primary series comprised 271 complete months. Mean RSV increased from 18.6 during 2015-2019 to 64.8 during 2022-2023 (3.49-fold) and remained 50.6 during January 2024-July 2026 (2.73-fold above baseline). Search interest peaked in October 2022 (RSV 100); July 2026 RSV was 57. The interrupted time-series model estimated an immediate March 2020 level increase of 21.8 points (95% CI 2.8-40.7; p=0.024), while the slope change was not statistically supported (0.069 points/month, 95% CI 0.299 to 0.438; p=0.713). Searches for 'POTS symptoms', 'POTS test' and 'POTS heart rate' increased more steeply than the general term, although low baseline volumes made fold changes unstable. Conclusions: UK Google search interest in POTS rose before 2020, increased sharply after the pandemic began, and remained substantially above its prepandemic baseline. The results demonstrate a sustained change in public attention, not disease incidence or social-media causation. The growth of symptom- and testing-oriented searches is compatible with increased diagnostic self-investigation and warrants linkage to referral, diagnosis and social-media exposure data.

Background Falls are a major safety concern in healthcare. In palliative care, patients are particularly vulnerable due to complex symptom burdens and rapid physical decline. However, standard falls risk assessment tools, primarily designed for acute clinical environments, rely on static risk scores and lack efficacy in hospice settings. The Falls Early Warning Score (FEWS) is a observational tool developed to address the specific contributing factors and complex needs of palliative patients. Aims To explore and understand staff views regarding the implementation, utility, and benefits of the FEWS tool to identify people at risk of falling in a specialist palliative care inpatient unit. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted at a UK hospice. Healthcare professionals with clinical experience using the FEWS chart completed an electronic questionnaire assessing their confidence, practice, and perceived barriers. Questionnaire outcomes informed subsequent face-to-face, semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were evaluated using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Eleven staff completed the questionnaire, and five participated in interviews. Three major themes were identified: (1) Education, highlighting staff preferences for 1:1 training and the necessity of dedicated user guides; (2) Location and format of the FEWS tool, contrasting the data collection benefits of electronic formats against the bedside accessibility of paper charts; and (3) Recognised benefits of the FEWS tool, including its ability to prompt safe staffing levels, highlight variable patient presentation, and mitigate the emotional and physical impact of falls. Conclusions It is feasible and highly acceptable to integrate bespoke falls risk assessment tools into palliative care. By addressing the unique complexities of hospice patients, customised tools like FEWS can empower staff and support dynamic clinical decision-making. Further research is required to evaluate their clinical efficacy in reducing falls.

Gaps remain in the evidence base for postoperative management following forefoot surgery. A recent randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04927234) demonstrated improved outcomes with intermittent one Hertz (Hz) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) of the common peroneal nerve. This sub-analysis evaluates its effect in patients undergoing forefoot surgery. Forty-two patients undergoing forefoot procedures were included; 26 received NMES plus standard of care (SOC) and 16 received SOC alone. Wound healing was assessed at 14 days. Edema was measured using the figure-of-eight (FO8) method. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). At 14 days, complete wound healing occurred in 77% of patients receiving NMES plus SOC compared with 40% in the SOC group (p<0.05). Edema reduction was significantly greater in the NMES group, with a 74% relative reduction compared with SOC (p=0.02). Intermittent one Hz NMES of the common peroneal nerve was associated with improved wound healing and reduced postoperative edema following forefoot surgery.

Background Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) affects between 7-23% and 13-44% of patients after hip and knee arthroplasty, respectively. Standardised methods of pain assessment provide superior evaluation of pain, including the Oxford Joint Score Pain Subscale (OJS-PS). We aim to estimate the proportion of patients with a phenotype consistent with CPSP through a k-medoids clustering technique and identify a threshold on the OJS-PS to highlight such patients at a population level. Methods In this cross-sectional study Patient Reported Outcomes Measures data 6-months after hip and knee arthroplasty from 2017 to 2025 were examined. An adapted k-medoid clustering technique utilising subsampling, batch assignment and probabilistic consensus allocated clusters. A receiver operator characteristic analysis identified a threshold on the OJS-PS noting the lowest scoring cluster. Our categorisation was compared to self-reported severe or moderate pain; sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of this categorisation were calculated. Results We analysed 109,542 hip and 113,799 knee arthroplasty patients; three clusters were used in each analysis. After hip arthroplasty: 14.4% of patients were assigned to the cluster with the lowest median OJS-PS of 11 [IQR 8 - 13]. A threshold of 15.5 classified patients as severe or moderate pain with 60.6% sensitivity, 91.0% specificity and 85.7% accuracy. Similarly, after knee arthroplasty, 25.3% were assigned to the cluster with the lowest median OJS-PS of 14 [IQR 11 - 16]. A threshold of 18.5 on the OJS-PS had an 85.4% sensitivity, 88.4% specificity and 87.8% accuracy for classifying patients with self-reported severe or moderate pain. Conclusions This robust and scalable clustering technique on ordinal clinical data estimates the proportion of patients reporting a phenotype consistent with CPSP. On a population level the thresholds identified on the OJS-PS could aid screening for potential CPSP patients 6 months after hip and knee arthroplasties.

Introduction: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) offers an advancement over traditional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) for people living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, evidence on the acceptability and feasibility of different CGM use cases in African populations remains limited. Methods: This was a pragmatic three-arm, randomised controlled trial on CGM conducted among people living with T1D in three public healthcare clinics in South Africa. Participants were assigned to Arm 1 (continuous CGM), Arm 2 (periodic CGM), or Arm 3 (SMBG). Diabetes education was provided at all study visits. Feasibility was assessed by adherence to CGM use and through the Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey (GMSS). Diabetes distress was measured by the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by the EQ-5D scales, and acceptability using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). Surveys were collected on paper and transferred to OpenClinica. Analyses were performed in R. The trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry (NCT05944718) on July 13, 2023. Results: A total of 83 participants were included in Arm 1, 85 in Arm 2, and 80 in Arm 3. CGM mean active time was 55% in Arm 1 versus 69% in Arm 2. The proportion of participants meeting the [&ge;]70% active time threshold was higher in Arm 2 (52%) than in Arm 1 (34%). Diabetes' distress declined across arms during the intervention period, with no significant difference between arms; distress increased slightly six months post-intervention but remained below baseline. At 6 months, glucose monitoring satisfaction was significantly higher in both CGM arms than in the SMBG arm, and satisfaction increased over time in CGM arms. Health-related quality of life remained stable across arms during the intervention period with no significant difference between arms. High acceptability was observed in both CGM arms, with higher ratings in the periodic arm. Conclusions: CGM was acceptable to people living with type 1 diabetes and feasible to use in public-sector clinics in South Africa, with high acceptability under continuous and periodic use. Health-related quality of life remained stable across arms, and diabetes-related distress declined, during the intervention period, across arms. Glucose monitoring satisfaction rose significantly in both CGM arms compared to SMBG. Periodic CGM might be a promising and potentially more scalable option than continuous use for public-sector care.

Introduction Diabetes distress describes the psychological and emotional burden of living with diabetes and is associated with reduced self-management and adverse diabetes outcomes. Clinical guidelines recommend routine assessment and management of diabetes distress, but this is not always implemented. Therefore, there is a need to develop approaches to deliver emotional health support in routine clinical care more effectively. We describe here the protocol for a study to I) assess the feasibility of implementation of the D-stress Pathway, comprising Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) and an online, group-based, psychological diabetes distress reduction intervention called REDUCE, ii) evaluate the feasibility of the study protocol iii) detect an effect signal of diabetes distress score and Interstitial Glucose Time in Range and iv) refine initial programme theories of how both interventions (EUC and REDUCE) work, for whom, and under what circumstances. Methods This feasibility study includes a multicentre trial within a cohort design (TWICs) where sites have a staggered exposure to the interventions alongside a realist process evaluation. Four UK NHS diabetes services will recruit 80 adults with type 1 diabetes ([&ge;]1 year) using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) ([&ge;]3 months). All participants will receive EUC and provide monthly data over 7 months on diabetes distress (measured by the Type 1 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T1DDAS) and interstitial glucose measured by using continuous glucose monitoring. Participants with elevated diabetes distress, will be offered the six-week, group-based, online REDUCE intervention plus EUC, compared to EUC alone. Up to twenty participants with type 1 diabetes, ten family members/friends, sixteen healthcare professionals delivering EUC and five REDUCE facilitators will be interviewed to explore their experience of receiving training and delivering the D-stress Pathway. Up to 20 EUC consultations and REDUCE sessions will be observed. Analysis Feasibility will be assessed against pre-specified progression criteria and analysed descriptively using summary statistics. Primary outcomes include baseline level of diabetes distress, recruitment rate, intervention uptake, and data completeness, which will be analysed descriptively. Qualitative data will be analysed using framework analysis guided by realist programme theories developed for this study. Ethics Ethics approval has been granted by NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC) (Bromley REC: 25/LO/0469) and Health Research Authority obtained. All participants will provide informed consent. Trial registration no: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT07193446 on 26/11/2025. Protocol and statistical analysis plan: The trial protocol and statistical analysis plan can be accessed at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Abstract Importance: Socially vulnerable patients have a high burden of obstructive sleep apnea, but the stage of the referral pathway at which access barriers arise is uncertain. Objective: To determine whether area-level social deprivation was associated with appointment scheduling, wait time, cancellations, or no-shows among adults referred for specialist obstructive sleep apnea care. Design: This was a cross-sectional study evaluating patients referred from December 1, 2016 through November 30, 2019. Data were analyzed from January 30, 2026 to May 16, 2026. Setting: Foothills Medical Centre Sleep Centre in Calgary, Canada. Participants: Adults referred to a tertiary academic sleep centre in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Eligible patients had valid provincial health insurance and either a scheduled clinic appointment or home sleep apnea test data available. Exposures: Quintiles of the four Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation domains: residential instability, economic dependency, ethnocultural composition, and situational vulnerability. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was receipt of a scheduled specialist appointment. Secondary outcomes were time from referral to the first attended appointment and number of appointment cancellations or no-shows. Results: Among 3111 patients (mean [SD] age, 53.7 [14.3] years; 40.7% female), 1766 (56.7%) were scheduled and 1647 (52.9%) attended an appointment. Each quintile increase in situational vulnerability was associated with lower odds of scheduling (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.86 [0.81-0.92]), whereas each quintile increase in ethnocultural composition was associated with higher odds (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.32 [1.22-1.43]). Residential instability and economic dependency were not associated with scheduling. No deprivation domain was associated with time to the first attended appointment, cancellations, or no-shows. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort, area-level deprivation was associated with whether patients were scheduled for an appointment but not with wait time or missed visits after scheduling. These findings suggest that equity interventions should focus on completion of referral and scheduling processes.

Background Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most common cause of nontraumatic spinal cord dysfunction in adults. For mild disease, guidelines recommend shared decision-making between surgery and structured rehabilitation on the basis of clinical equipoise, yet no comparative effectiveness study has reported outcomes in this population. Whether a randomized trial is feasible is unknown. Methods We conducted two cross-sectional surveys between December 2025 and July 2026: one of patients with surgeon-confirmed CSM recruited from academic outpatient spine clinics, and one of practicing neurosurgical and orthopedic spine surgeons. Respondents rated willingness to participate in (1) a randomized trial of early surgery versus observation and (2) a prospective observational study in which treatment was patient-selected. Responses of likely or very likely were classified as willing. Groups were compared using Fisher exact tests, designs within respondents using exact McNemar tests, and predictors using univariable logistic regression. Results Fifty-four patients and 52 surgeons completed the surveys. Patients were markedly less willing than surgeons to accept randomization (15 of 54, 27.8% versus 44 of 52, 84.6%; p < 0.001). Both groups accepted the observational design (39 of 54, 72.2% versus 51 of 52, 98.1%; p < 0.001), and 26 of 39 patients unwilling to be randomized were willing to enroll in an observational study (p < 0.001). Willingness to be randomized did not differ across mJOA severity (mild 30.4%, moderate 25.0%, severe 27.3%; p = 0.93). Among patients declining randomization, 85.2% cited a wish to retain control over treatment, whereas fear of surgery was cited by one respondent. Forty-five surgeons (86.5%) considered both surgery and observation reasonable, and preference was divided (46.2% favoring early surgery, 48.1% favoring initial observation). Conclusions Surgeons report equipoise and high willingness to randomize, but most patients would decline random allocation, citing a wish to retain treatment choice rather than fear or distrust. A prospective observational study appears the more feasible route to comparative evidence in mild CSM. Feasibility assessments restricted to clinicians may substantially overestimate attainable accrual.

Background Treatment of Raynaud phenomenon(RP) with oral vasodilators(calcium channel block-ers and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors) has shown moderate efficacy, may not benefit to all patients, and adverse effects often compromise long-term treatment. In addition, a large placebo effect may jeopardize the assessment of treatment benefits. Pharmaconutritional strategies aiming at increasing nitric oxide bioavailability (beet-root juice and L-citrulline) may be promising alternatives, and we further hypothesized that patient preference for a treatment could be a driver of the response. Methods This study consisted of a series of randomized, double-blind, N-of-1 trials conducted in outpa-tients with primary or secondary RP. Each patient underwent a multiple crossover design with repeated blocks of randomized treatments periods: 2 weeks of placebo, 2 weeks of active treat-ments, and 1 week of washout. Outcomes included the Raynaud Condition Score(RCS), fre-quency and daily duration of attacks. Each patient prespecified its preferred primary outcome, efficacy threshold and preferred treatment, which was used for stratified randomization. Gener-alized linear mixed-effects models were used to determine individual and aggregated efficacy. Results Twenty-one patients completed 2 to 8 treatment blocks. Seventeen patients tested L-citrulline, 17 beetroot juice and 13 both treatments. Ten patients selected RCS as a primary outcome, 6 patients the number of attacks and 5 the duration of attacks. Me-dian threshold for considering treatment efficacy chosen by patients was 50% (min-max 20% to 75%) reduction of symptoms. Using individual criteria to define efficacy neither L-citrulline nor beetroot juice showed significant efficacy compared to baseline. Based on the aggregated data, our results show no significant difference between L-citrulline and the L-citrulline-based placebo, nor between beetroot juice and nitrate-depleted beetroot juice, with the exception of the daily duration of RP attacks with beetroot juice (p=0.002). Finally, there was a marked placebo response, notably when patients received their preferred treatment. Conclusions: Our study did not show significant beetroot juice or L-citrulline efficacy in RP. However, we found that individual preference for one treatment over another maximizes responses to both placebo and active treatments, particularly with regard to the frequency and duration of RP attacks, thus suggesting that a real and modifiable placebo effect exists in RP.

Background: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a growing public health concern in low- and middle-income countries, where access to glucose monitoring and consistent routine care remains limited. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) may improve diabetes outcomes, but evidence of its acceptability and use in low-resource settings is limited. This study explored the perceptions and experiences of CGM use among people living with T1D, their caregivers, and healthcare providers (HCPs). Methods: Participants were recruited from the ACCEDE-U study, a usability study on CGM use among people living with T1D attending a tertiary referral hospital in Nairobi, Kenya. Among 40 participants in the ACCEDE-U study, those who had completed at least seven weeks of CGM use were eligible to participate in the qualitative component. Three focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted: one with nine caregivers, one with nine adolescents (12-17 years), and one with six young adults (18-24 years). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 9 HCPs. Data was collected using guides, audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically guided by the socioecological framework. CORE-Q guidelines were used to report results. Results: Participants reported increased engagement in glucose monitoring and high acceptability of CGM. Reduced finger-prick testing and real-time alerts were key benefits, particularly among adolescents and young adults, who valued its discreetness and convenience. CGM was perceived to facilitate sharing of glucose data with HCPs. Caregivers reported a reduced monitoring burden. HCPs perceived CGM as valuable for clinical decision-making by providing real-time insights into glycemic patterns. Cost and limited device availability were identified as major barriers to sustained use. Conclusion: CGM was well accepted and perceived as beneficial. However, challenges related to cost and access may limit broader uptake. Improving affordability and availability could enhance feasibility and promote wider implementation in similar settings.

Objectives To explore the acceptability and tolerability of cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) using Alpha-Stim AID as a potential intervention for anxiety associated with breathlessness in people with advanced chronic respiratory disease. Methods A multicentre, mixed-methods, non-randomised interventional feasibility study with a parallel usual-care control group. Participants were adults with chronic respiratory disease and significant anxiety and breathlessness symptoms (assessed via Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale) receiving care from hospice services. The intervention groups used Alpha-Stim AID for eight weeks either at a fixed or personalised dose, followed by a four-week follow-up period. This feasibility study was not powered to assess clinical efficacy. Results 12.5% of screened patients at the primary site were eligible, and 29 unique participants were recruited. Three participants withdrew from the study (10.3%), none of which were attributable to CES. Most adverse events were mild, with headache reported frequently across control and intervention groups. Outcome measure completion was high, with data missingness below 6.4%. Numerical rating scales of anxiety and breathlessness fluctuated daily and remained broadly static, whereas GAD-7 scores assessing anxiety improved over time across all groups. This feasibility study was not powered to assess clinical efficacy. Conclusion CES using Alpha-Stim AID was deliverable within hospice services and was generally acceptable and tolerable among participants who enrolled. Our findings support further evaluation which should involve a fully-powered randomised controlled trial against a sham device to determine whether CES provides clinically meaningful improvements in anxiety for this patient population.

Introduction Acute lower respiratory tract disease (aLRTD) is a leading cause of hospitalisation and death, particularly in older adults and adults with comorbidities, with acute lower respiratory tract infection (aLRTI; pneumonia and non-pneumonic LRTI) being a major component. Non-pulmonary complications and functional decline after aLRTI are recognised, but their pathogen-specific burden is poorly described. We aimed to quantify renal, hepatic, thromboembolic and functional complications, and mortality, after aLRTI hospitalisation, by clinical phenotype and pathogen. Methods We conducted a cohort study of adults (>18 years) admitted with aLRTD to two hospitals in Bristol, UK (01 August 2022-31 July 2024). aLRTD was classified as pneumonia, non-pneumonic LRTI (NP-LRTI) or no diagnosis of aLRTI. Pathogens were identified from standard-of-care and research microbiology. Outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI), acute liver dysfunction, venous thromboembolism (VTE), in-hospital falls, reduced mobility at discharge, increased care requirements, and 30-day and 1-year mortality. Analyses were descriptive. Results Among 246,797 adult admissions, 21,456 aLRTD hospitalisations were included: 10,239 (47.7%) pneumonia, 7,742 (36.1%) NP-LRTI and 3,475 (16.2%) with no evidence of aLRTI. Of 19,152 tested aLRTD admissions, 8,503 (44.4%) had a positive microbiological/virological test, yielding 9,204 pathogen detections; 1,194 (6.2%) had co-infections, and SARS-CoV-2 was most frequent, with influenza the second most common in pneumonia and NP-LRTI. Pneumonia had greater severity than NP-LRTI and no diagnosis of aLRTI (median length of stay 6 vs 4 vs 4 days; ICU admission 3.4% vs 0.7% vs 0.5%, respectively). Overall, 22.2% developed AKI, 6.1% acute liver dysfunction, 0.6% DVT and 2.4% PE; 1.8% had a fall, 11.5% reduced mobility, and 16.6% required increased care at discharge. 30-day and 1-year mortality were highest for pneumonia (14.0% and 32.0%, respectively). Pathogen-specific analyses showed longer stays and higher complications and mortality rates for SARS-CoV-2 and Streptococcus pneumoniae, and shorter stays with lower complication and mortality rates for influenza and Haemophilus influenzae. Conclusions Non-cardiovascular complications and functional decline after aLRTI were common, particularly in pneumonic and SARS-CoV-2 or pneumococcal disease. These findings support routine surveillance for renal, hepatic, thromboembolic events, early mobilisation and rehabilitation, and consideration of multi-system outcomes when evaluating public health and economic value of vaccines and therapies.

Introduction: Shared medical appointments (SMAs) are medical visits where multiple individuals are seen together in a group setting. For patients with inherited cardiovascular disease, where multiple family members often require ongoing cardiac care and screening, family SMAs may be particularly valuable as a tool to facilitate family communication and comprehension of their condition. This research aimed to identify patient perspectives on the potential benefits and challenges of family SMAs in comparison to an existing individual clinic model. Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with adult family representatives. Each family had at least one family member seen at the adult and pediatric inherited cardiovascular disease clinics. Interview recordings were transcribed verbatim and inductively coded using a content analysis approach. Results: Sixteen families were interviewed in this study. The mean age of the family representative interviewed was 43.4 years ({+/-} 9.3 SD), and they were followed at Stanford Health Care for a mean of 7.3 years ({+/-} 4.2 SD). 81.2% (13/16) of families said they would find family SMAs beneficial. For interested families who consented to recorded interviews (n=12), benefits and challenges fell into two major categories: care quality and access and logistics. Interested families thought family SMAs would provide an added care quality benefit by increasing understanding among adults, children, and providers (83.3%, 10/12). Six of twelve participants interested in having family SMA visits felt there would be logistical/access-based benefits to this new model (50%, 6/12). Families also identified possible challenges with this model, such as less individualized care, potential privacy concerns, and concerns regarding the smoothness of the clinic process in coordinating a family SMA. Conclusion: The majority of families believed a family SMA model would provide added benefit to families with inherited cardiovascular disease, but requires thoughtful implementation and should be tailored to families? unique needs.

BACKGROUND Safe and effective antidepressant deprescribing strategies are needed in general practice where most antidepressant prescribing occurs. METHODS We conducted a pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial in general practice to test invitation to general practitioner (GP) review combined with resources to inform shared decision-making and guide hyperbolic tapering for stopping antidepressants compared to usual care. Adults taking antidepressants for longer than 12 months were recruited from 26 Australian GP practices between March 2023 and November 2024, irrespective of their intention to stop or depression or anxiety symptom scores. The primary outcome was cessation at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included cessation at 6 months, and >75% dose reduction and depression, anxiety and withdrawal symptom scores at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS Overall, 483 patients were randomised. Mean age was 50 years; 73% were women; mean duration of antidepressant use was 14.1 years. Cessation at 12 months was observed in 32 of 215 (14.9%) intervention and 16 of 187 (8.6%) usual care patients (odds ratio (OR) = 1.95 [95%CI, 1.00 to 3.81]; p=0.050). Cessation at 6 months was observed in 11.7% intervention vs 4.8% usual care (OR = 2.68; 95%CI, 1.18 to 6.05), and >75% dose reduction at 12 months in 19.6% intervention vs 9.9% usual care (OR = 2.28; 95%CI, 1.20 to 4.31). Symptom scores were similar between groups. No adverse events were attributable to the intervention. CONCLUSIONS In general practice, invitation to GP antidepressant review combined with information and guidance on hyperbolic tapering can support cessation or dose reduction without causing adverse effects or relapse. Absolute cessation rates were modest but still meaningful given the high prevalence of long term antidepressant use. TRIAL REGISTRATION ANZCT registry identifier, ACTRN12622001379707p.

Background Digital legacy (the digital information available about someone following their death) has increasing societal importance as personal assets and interactions become increasingly digitized. Healthcare professionals often have a limited understanding of how to address digital legacy in practice, and there is a lack of interdisciplinary networks to improve education, research, and professional development in digital legacy. Objective This paper describes the development of an interdisciplinary initiative designed to build research capacity and develop consensus-based recommendations for integrating digital legacy into palliative care. Method Over 12-months, we conducted interdisciplinary engagement activities with diverse stakeholders, including clinicians, designers, and sociologists. We used a modified World Cafe method to facilitate dialogue and capture feedback on how memories are digitally curated, the management of digital estates, and intergenerational perspectives on digital legacy. Results We identified eight core recommendations for research and policy, including promoting digital legacy education, supporting policy development, and broadening the scope of interdisciplinary research. Our discussions highlighted the complexity of modern digital estates and the need for legal and ethical frameworks to protect individual rights. Conclusions The Network demonstrates that interdisciplinary collaboratives can address important issues relating to digital legacy, which provides a foundation to conduct collaborative research that improves the management of digital legacies in society.

Rationale: Dislocation is the leading reason for early revision surgery. To address the problem of dislocation, the dual-mobility (DM) cup was developed in France in the 1970s. This cup should provide more stability and biomechanically reduce the risk of dislocation. In the Netherlands, most DM cups are placed in specific patients, e.g. with cognitive impairment and for revisions due to recurrent dislocations. Despite the increased and, in some countries, broad use of DM cups, high quality evidence of their (cost)effectiveness is lacking. This study aims to perform a trial to fill this gap in knowledge. Much of the information needed to judge the effectiveness of DM cups is already incorporated in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI). This register lends itself perfectly for a nested RCT towards this aim. Objective: The primary objective is to investigate whether there is a difference in the number of hip dislocations following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), using the posterolateral approach, with a DM cup compared to a unipolar cup in elderly patients 1 year after surgery. The secondary objectives are: to investigate whether there is a difference in the number of revisions; to investigate what the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility is of a DM cup compared to a unipolar cup at 1 year follow-up; to investigate whether there is a difference in the number of hip dislocations and revisions between a DM cup and a unipolar cup 2 years after surgery; to investigate whether there is a difference in patient reported outcomes between a DM cup compared to a unipolar cup 1 and 2 years after surgery; to compare the number of hip dislocations, revisions and PROM data between patients in the randomized DM group and patients in an observational cohort DM group. Finally, long-term survival of DM and unipolar cups will be evaluated based on revision and mortality data registered in the LROI. Study design: Prospective multi-center international wide within the European Union (EU), single blinded RCT, nested in the national registry. Study population: Patients [&ge;] 70 years old, undergoing an elective primary THA. Intervention (if applicable): The intervention group receives a THA with a dual mobility cup, the control group receives a THA with a unipolar cup. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary: The number of dislocations. Secondary: costs, patient reported outcomes and implant survival.